Literatur Review Motivasi Terhadap Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Kinerja Organisasi
Keywords:
Motivation, Performance, Organization, Literature ReviewAbstract
This literature review aims to synthesize several studies related to motivation in organizational performance. This article analyzes the literature through electronic databases obtained from Scopus. The software used in the systematic literature is Microsoft Excel. Based on the search results, motivation is a research that is often cited and still needs further research. Motivation as an effort to improve and develop organizational performance continues to experience various new things or changes either in the organization in the organizational cultural environment or the human resources themselves. Then motivation continues to experience the rapid development of theory and is beneficial for the continuity of an organization or the world of education.
Downloads
References
Bakker A.B., Demerouti E. 2017. Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22 (3), pp. 273-285.
Bandura, A. 1982. Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122-147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bandura, A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. 1986. The Explanatory and Predictive Scope of Self-Efficacy Theory. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4, 359-373.
Bandura, A. 1988. Self-Regulation of Motivation and Action through Goal Systems. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive Perspectives on Emotion and Motivation (pp. 37-61). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bandura, A. 2007. Much ado over a Faculty Conception of Perceived Self-Efficacy Grounded in Faculty Experimentation. Journal of Social and clinical Psychology, 26, 641-658.
Bandura, A. 2019. Applying Theory for Human Betterment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 12-15.
Burlea-Schiopoiu, A., 2013, An Aristotelian approach to sustainable management, in Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, Editors Samuel O. Idowu, Nicholas Capaldi, Liangrong Zu, Ananda das Gupta, SpringerVerlag Berlin Heidelberg.
Burlea-Schiopoiu, A., Idowu, S., Vertigas, St. 2017. Corporate Social Responsibility in Times of Crisis: A Summary, Springer.
Kok M.C., Dieleman M., Taegtmeyer M., Broerse J.E.W., Kane S.S., Ormel H., Tijm M.M., De Koning K.A.M.2015, Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review. Health Policy and Planning, 30 (9), pp. 1207-1227.
Kozanits, A. 2010. L’influence d’innovations pédagogiques sur le profil motivationnel et le choix de stratégies d’apprentissage d’étudiantes et d’étudiants d’une faculté d’ingénierie. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur, 26.
Limone, A. and Marinovic, M. 2013 The Theory of the Organization and the New Paradigms. Open Journal of Business and Management, 1, 30-38. doi: 10.4236/ojbm.2013.12005.
Mullins, L. J. 2005. Management and Organizational Behavior. London: FT Pitman.
Su C.H., Cheng C.H. 2015. A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31 (3), pp. 268-286.
Weidman, N. 1999. Constructing Scientific Psychology: Karl Lashley’s Mind-Brain Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
