ANALISA SEMIOTIKA KEKERASAN RASISME DALAM FILM DETROIT

Authors

  • Kurnia Wahyu Suryadi Universitas Sahid Surakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

Detroit, Film, Semiotic, Rasism

Abstract

The study aims to classify the types of racist violence and explain the meaning of racist violence in the Detroit film. This research used a qualitative method. The data collection method used observation and documentation techniques. This research implemented analysis from Roland Barthes, and it is used to analyze scenes in the Detroit film that contain elements of violent racism as the research data. The data are the dialogue of characters and also scenes in the Detroit film. The data will include three stages of semiotic analysis according to Roland Barthes semiotics analysis, namely, denotation, connotation, and myth. The first stage or denotation describes the real form of a sign, and the second stage or connotation is to interpret the meaning of a sign. Besides, this research data will also be analyzed based on the meaning of myth through the signs that contain elements of violent racism from the perspective of community culture. There are six categories of racist violence in the Detroit film: fascist and psychological violence, positive and negative influences, with or without object, with or without subject, intentional or not, visible and hidden. Based on six categories, there are five meanings, namely: injustice, disappointment, prejudice, intimidation, discrimination. Based on the five meanings in the scene, the dominant is intimidation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alex Sobur, 2003, Semiotika Komunikasi Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Astuti, Santi Indra. 2006. How To Do Media and Cultural Studies: Panduan untuk Melaksanakan Penelitian dalam Kajian Media dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Benteng.
Adler, Patricia A. & Peter Adler. “Teknik-Teknik Observasi” dalam Handbook of Qualitative Research.Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln, (Ed.)., Dariyatno., Badrus Samsul Fata, (penjermah). Yogyakarta.
Baron, A. Robert & Byrne, Donn.1991. Social Psychology. London: Allyn and Bacon.
Berger. Arthur Asa 2000. Media Aanalysis Technique. Second edition. Alih Bahasa Setio Budi HH. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya.
Chamidi, Safrudin. (2004). “Kaitan antara Data dan Informasi Pendidikan dengan Perencanaan Pendidikan,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (48) 10, hlm. 311—328.
Charmaz, Kathy., 2006, Constructing Grounded Theory, London: Sage Publications.
Dollard, John; Doob, Leonard W; Miller, Neal; Mowrer, O.H.; Sears, Robert. (1939). Frustation and Agression. New Haven: Yale University Press
Effendy, Onong Uchjana. 2005. Ilmu Komunikasi (Teori dan Praktek). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Effendy, Onong Uchjana, 1986. Dimensi Dimensi Komunikasi, Bandung: Alumni.
Effendy, Onong Uchjana, 2000. Ilmu, Teori, Filsafat komunikasi, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kurniawan. (2001). Semiologi Roland Barthes. Magelang: Yayasan Indonesia Tera.
Littlejohn, Stephen W & Karen A. Foss.2009. Teori Komunikasi, edisi 9. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Moleong Lexy J., 2001Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, PT Remaja Rosda Karya: Bandung.
Ringer, Robert J. (2004). To Be or Not to Be Intimidated?: That Is the Question. M Evans & Co Inc. ISBN 1-59077-035-8.

Sobur, Alex. (2003). Semiotika Komunikasi. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Saryono, 2010. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, PT. Alfabeta, Bandung.
Strauss, Anselm L., 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientist, Cambridge:
Cambrigde University Press
Sutopo. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UNS.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Uma, Sekaran. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian untuk Bisnis, Edisi 4. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-24

Citation Check